hornarama
2500+ posts
04/04/12 02:53 PM
|
|
Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
|
| |
Why do we emphasize the fade so much? If you don't have a big tall athletic receiver with great hands, along with a QB that is consistently accurate, the fade sucks. Recognizing the limits of my (imperfect) memory watching from the stands, I really don't remember too many successful fades (in any meaningful situations) in the last several years. Yet watching the spring highlights, there were a number of fade routes (as usual) thrown. I've grown to hate our fade attempts, because it seems against any decent competition we hit about 1 in a 100.
Post Extras:
|
texas_ex2000
1000+ posts
04/04/12 03:15 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
I have no opinion on the post.
But it does jog my memory of two great fade routes.
Major to Brian White - Nebraska (more of a fly route the more I look at it)
Vince to Limas Sweed - Ohio St.
Post Extras:
|
PropositionJoe
500+ posts
04/04/12 03:20 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
i dont think you HAVE to have a tall WR to run the fade.
the routes just have to be run correctly and the QB has to deliver the ball to the right spot.
more reps=hopefully better at running the play when it counts.
Post Extras:
|
Hpslugga
10,000+ posts
04/04/12 03:42 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
i dont think you HAVE to have a tall WR to run the fade.
Exactly. You just need a guy who has a decent vertical and is reliable at fighting for the ball when it's thrown.
The Bridge Builder
Post Extras:
|
Longtex
100+ posts
04/04/12 03:55 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: Hpslugga] |
| |
In reply to:
fighting for the ball
[censored] me, but this has made me crazy the last couple of years! I don't give a [censored] if you get flagged for offensive PI, go get that (*&@#$&% ball! The penalty's better than the INT, and that is OUR ball, not the defense's ball. Kick that sumbitch in the nuts, knee him in the stomach, do what it takes - lay out and eat turf when you hit, but that's OUR ball.
/rant
"Don't talk to me about woulda-shoulda-coulda... what shoulda happened DID happen." -- Saint Darrell Royal, c. 1961
Post Extras:
|
dheiman
500+ posts
04/04/12 04:07 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
this has made me crazy the last couple of years
You and me both brother. We haven't had a dominating receiver in some time. One on one our receivers haven't been the dominant force in the past 5-6 seasons. Injuries and youth might be part of that problem as well but I would kill to have another Wane McGarity or Roy.
Life's certainties: Death, Taxes and OU sucks.
Get your gear at choke-lahoma.com
Post Extras:
|
1leggedduck
1000+ posts
04/04/12 04:23 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
that is OUR ball, not the defense's ball
That's funny. That's what I used to tell my middle son (the mean one) during basketball games. "Hey boy, they got your ball. You gonna let them play with your ball?"
Post Extras:
|
Third Coast
10,000+ posts
04/04/12 04:41 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
I'm very particular about who I let play with my balls.
Post Extras:
|
RomaVicta
10,000+ posts
04/04/12 04:52 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
Ash and Shipley connected on a beautiful fade at the Spring Game. I think what made it work was Shipley's explosive burst to the corner after the ball was thrown leaving the db confused about where to be.
But I'm no expert.
Brewer threw a beautiful arching td pass himself Sunday. He hit another perfect pass on the sideline dropping the ball where only the receiver had a shot at it. Of course, it was 3s vs 3s, so I'm not advocating a QB controversy or anything.
Post Extras:
|
georgecostanza
500+ posts
04/04/12 04:54 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
I'm very particular about who I let play with my balls.
The real question is, are you master of your domain?
Post Extras:
|
Uninformed
10,000+ posts
04/04/12 05:14 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
FIFY
<Jerry Sandusky> I'm very particular about who I let play with my balls. <Jerry Sandusky>
Hookem
Post Extras:
|
Texas Taps
5000+ posts
04/04/12 06:53 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
I'm going to bleed orange until the day I die
-Vince Young
Post Extras:
|
BigEarlinBastrop
500+ posts
04/04/12 07:25 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
that is OUR ball, not the defense's ball
Totally agree about needing this attitude. And Shipley has it. Remember him fighting for ball as he came down on goal line? (atm? Holiday Bowl?) Anyway, he literally took back an intercepted ball.
"... and it's good-bye to a&m." 
Post Extras:
|
TNLonghorn
500+ posts
04/04/12 09:49 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
Shipley 2.0 is a force to be reckoned with. He is not afraid of being a badass football player.
Post Extras:
|
PhantomHorn
5000+ posts
04/05/12 05:07 AM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
Best fade pass I ever saw was Garder to Kerry Cash in 1st qtr of 1990 Texas/OU game. video. forward to 23 minutes
If you let Rome teach
your children; don't be surprised when they grow up to be
Romans.
Edited by PhantomHorn (04/05/12 05:17 AM)
Post Extras:
|
PropositionJoe
500+ posts
04/05/12 07:40 AM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
i always feel weird talking football "theory" on a thread that hp is on. i feel like i'm going to get something wrong and he's going to give me the "i award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul" speech.
that being said, how the WR starts the play is just as important as how the WR ends the play with a fade--getting off the LOS and using hands to get the DB on their heels is important. i've seen guys who lack the power at the LOS do a quick stutter to get one step on the DB in an effort to get to the corner.
Post Extras:
|
Detective Shilala
2500+ posts
04/05/12 08:02 AM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
In reply to:
[censored] me, but this has made me crazy the last couple of years! I don't give a [censored] if you get flagged for offensive PI, go get that (*&@#$&% ball!
I was very disappointed to see Mike Davis allow a go ahead interception on Sunday. So its not catchable, so two DBs have a better shot at it than you. But at least try and get in the goddam way...
I thought the guy had gotten his head right, but his body language was like "aw hell, I don't even give a [censored], have the pick". Looked a lot like the Mike Davis of last year.
Edited by Detective Shilala (04/05/12 08:04 AM)
Post Extras:
|
hornpharmd
10,000+ posts
04/05/12 08:05 AM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: Hpslugga] |
| |
In reply to:
You just need a guy who has a decent vertical and is reliable at fighting for the ball when it's thrown.
And better throws. Both in terms off ball placement and in terms of not throwing when the DB is not playing tight at the line. If the DB is playing off and basically in the endzone waiting for that pass then that is a mistake.
Post Extras:
|
Hpslugga
10,000+ posts
04/05/12 08:16 AM
|
|
In reply to:
i feel like i'm going to get something wrong and he's going to give me the "i award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul" speech.
Well you might be an aggie, but you haven't veered into AggieEric-esque aggydom, at least not yet 
In all seriousness, you're right about what's needed out of a WR in a fade concept. And, IMHO, it's a much broader concept than just football. Would anyone, for example, go to the Basketball board and ask why any team utilizes the alley oop when they don't have a 7-footer on the team? That question is never asked. You also won't see anyone on the Baseball board asking why a team doesn't put its tallest two players at right and left field.
In football, it's a general rule of thumb that your X and Z (outside receivers) are taller than the inside receivers, but that's exactly what that is: a rule of thumb. It's just assumed that those 3-4 people have similar-ish vertical jumps, and if that's the case, you definitely want the tallest guy out there. But sometimes it's not true, and you can end up with cases that lead to things like Jaxon Shipley being the best option for a fade route even though he's only 6'1". Why is he the best option? He consistently has the best technique, runs the best routes, and gives the best effort when the ball is in the air. I'd rather that than a 6'6" guy that can't do those things as well as a 6'1" that can.
The Bridge Builder
Post Extras:
|
Statalyzer
25,000+ posts
04/05/12 04:59 PM
|
|
Re: Emphasis on fade routes without right personnel
[re: hornarama] |
| |
This thread brings back the 2009 OU game when we kept trying to throw fades to Jordan Shipley for some reason and they never worked.
We're Texas
Post Extras:
|
Shop the Co-op |
Email A Friend |
Contact Us
Pages in this thread: 1 | 
Rate thread
Print Thread
